Post Post Modern Ontology

I have created a new branch of knowledge called Epistemology of Value. The epistemology of value is reflected in an ontology (Being) that is constructive. There are two types of ontology: a constructive ontology and a destructive ontology.

Camus and Sartre are philosophers who have adopted a philosophy of ontological destruction. For them life is chaotic and absurd and makes no sense. They also celebrate entering a fallen pit of anarchy. Take the Camus Myth of Sisyphus. In it, the gods condemn a man to roll a boulder up a hill only to find that he rolls back down. Man is forced to repeat this pointless task over and over again. I would like to ask Camus: is life absurd? Is it chaotic? Camus’s philosophy is incoherent. If we follow the philosophy of Camus, we will not be able to live a meaningful life. Aren’t we living in a society where we celebrate the meaning of life? We are not beings living in isolation. We live in a community of shared meaning, or should we live as selfish individuals. Is life marked by the absence of reason and passion? We are beings that live in three states: Catharsis, Anguish and Ecstasy. The meaning of life is realized existentially.

What does Sartre have to say about ontological existentialism? Sartre’s Philosophy also celebrates the meaning of the absurd. Life for him is a coherent mass of nothing. We navigate our lives denying the meaning of existence. Is life chaotic and absurd? Is the choice we make to free ourselves a meaningless one? Sartre goes on to say that: we are doomed to be free. How can we say that freedom is our condemnation? Was Sartre a psychological casualty of World War II? Why is there so much negative theology in ontological philosophy?

I have read and reread existential philosophers like Camus and Sartre and have developed a new branch of existential ontology called constructive ontology. Constructive ontology creates a new meaning that life is creative and purposeful. We have to live a life in Valueblelization (from Value and Realization). Valueblelization means a creative life with celebration of sharing meanings in empathic harmony. For Valueblelization to occur, an individual is a purposeful of (Purpose and ist). We have to authenticate ourselves in a democratic empathy of sharing meanings.

Summing up I can say that the Philosophy of Camus and Sartre is destructive and by rereading them I have made ontology a constructive one.